Scope of Steam Generating Facilities under Consideration

In the past, EPA has occasionally opted to extend TRI coverage only to a portion of a sector. For example, TRI coverage of Electric Utilities (NAICS 2211) is limited to facilities that combust coal and/or oil for the purpose of generating power for distribution in commerce. Are there reasons why certain facilities in this sector should not be covered under TRI?

What is Exchange? Exchange is intended as a forum for you to provide feedback on Regulations.gov and various Agency initiatives. Your contributions to the forum do not represent an official comment in the rulemaking process. If you wish to submit an official comment on a Federal Register document, please follow this link to Regulations.gov.

| |

The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average five seconds for the ratings, 10 seconds for the registration form, 30 seconds for the tagging, and one minute for the nomination form. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques to the Environmental Protection Agency, eRulemaking Program Director, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, MC 2822T, Washington, DC 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Please do not send your completed form to this address.

Current Size: 100%

Steam Generating Facilities Discussion

Scope of Steam Generating Facilities under Consideration